<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>PermanentNotes &amp;mdash; Dino’s Journal 📖</title>
    <link>https://journal.dinobansigan.com/tag:PermanentNotes</link>
    <description>A peek into the mind of a sleep deprived software developer, husband, dad and gamer.</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 04:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
    
    <item>
      <title>Journal Entry - 003 | On Digital Gardens</title>
      <link>https://journal.dinobansigan.com/journal-entry-003?pk_campaign=rss-feed</link>
      <description>&lt;![CDATA[This was supposed to be a part of a bigger journal entry, but I found that I had more things to say on this topic, so it gets its own dedicated entry.&#xA;&#xA;Blog Posts vs Notes on a Digital Garden&#xA;&#xA;An interesting observation I&#39;ve made is that I bookmark blog posts, but I do not bookmark notes from digital gardens. &#xA;&#xA;Does this mean that blog posts provide more valuable information? Not necessarily, but they have their advantages from a reader&#39;s perspective.&#xA;&#xA;I think it&#39;s just easier to settle on a blog post I want to read, than to pick notes to read from a huge digital garden. It kinda relates to the article I read about Overchoice. It is hard to make a choice, when there&#39;s too many choices to make. And that&#39;s usually the situation with notes on a digital garden. The chronological or reverse chronological order of blog posts, which is looked at as a bad thing nowadays, is what makes it easier for me to pick something to read.!--more--&#xA;&#xA;There&#39;s also the fact that blog posts usually contain an author&#39;s processed and synthesized notes. They are more coherent and they serve to paint the bigger picture on a certain topic. Notes on a digital garden on the other hand, are really atomic sized thoughts. This means a reader will have to piece together ideas by following the links provided on the notes. That makes reading blog posts a better use of your time, because the author has already pieced together the notes for you.&#xA;&#xA;Literature Notes vs Permanent Notes&#xA;&#xA;I used to get confused about the idea of &#34;writing things down in your own words&#34;. I somehow thought that made the note my own. Writing it down in your words does make it your own version of a thought or idea. But that doesn&#39;t make it your own original thought or idea.&#xA;&#xA;Which lead me to this...&#xA;&#xA;One way to distinguish between a Literature Note and a Permanent Note is by asking this question: &#34;Is this someone else&#39;s idea or mine?&#34; If the answer is, &#34;It is my idea.&#34;, then it is a Permanent Note.&#xA;&#xA;Misc&#xA;&#xA;Lastly, if you want to publish your digital garden online, but don&#39;t want to pay for the &#34;Publish&#34; feature from Obsidian, check out Quartz. This is an open source repo that can turn an Obsidian vault into a digital garden website.&#xA;&#xA;When my &#34;Publish&#34; subscription ends, I plan on giving Quartz a try.&#xA;&#xA;Tags: #JournalEntry #DigitalGarden #LiteratureNotes #PermanentNotes #Zettelkasten&#xA;&#xA;!--emailsub--&#xA;&#xA;div id=&#34;post-signature&#34;&#xD;&#xA;div class=&#34;alert-info&#34;&#xD;&#xA;ba href=&#34;https://remark.as/p/journal.dinobansigan.com/journal-entry-003&#34;Discuss.../a/b or leave me a comment below.&#xD;&#xA;/div&#xD;&#xA;/div]]&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>This was supposed to be a part of a bigger journal entry, but I found that I had more things to say on this topic, so it gets its own dedicated entry.</em></p>

<h2 id="blog-posts-vs-notes-on-a-digital-garden" id="blog-posts-vs-notes-on-a-digital-garden">Blog Posts vs Notes on a Digital Garden</h2>

<p>An interesting observation I&#39;ve made is that I bookmark blog posts, but I do not bookmark notes from digital gardens.</p>

<p>Does this mean that blog posts provide more valuable information? Not necessarily, but they have their advantages from a reader&#39;s perspective.</p>

<p>I think it&#39;s just easier to settle on a blog post I want to read, than to pick notes to read from a huge digital garden. It kinda relates to the article I read about <a href="https://nesslabs.com/overchoice">Overchoice</a>. It is hard to make a choice, when there&#39;s too many choices to make. And that&#39;s usually the situation with notes on a digital garden. The chronological or reverse chronological order of blog posts, which is looked at as a bad thing nowadays, is what makes it easier for me to pick something to read.</p>

<p>There&#39;s also the fact that blog posts usually contain an author&#39;s processed and synthesized notes. They are more coherent and they serve to paint the bigger picture on a certain topic. Notes on a digital garden on the other hand, are really atomic sized thoughts. This means a reader will have to piece together ideas by following the links provided on the notes. That makes reading blog posts a better use of your time, because the author has already pieced together the notes for you.</p>

<h2 id="literature-notes-vs-permanent-notes" id="literature-notes-vs-permanent-notes">Literature Notes vs Permanent Notes</h2>

<p>I used to get confused about the idea of “writing things down in your own words”. I somehow thought that made the note my own. Writing it down in your words does make it your <em>own version</em> of a thought or idea. But that doesn&#39;t make it your <em>own original</em> thought or idea.</p>

<p>Which lead me to this...</p>

<p>One way to distinguish between a Literature Note and a Permanent Note is by asking this question: <em>“Is this someone else&#39;s idea or mine?”</em> If the answer is, <em>“It is my idea.”</em>, then it is a Permanent Note.</p>

<h2 id="misc" id="misc">Misc</h2>

<p>Lastly, if you want to publish your digital garden online, but don&#39;t want to pay for the “Publish” feature from Obsidian, check out <a href="https://github.com/jackyzha0/quartz">Quartz</a>. This is an open source repo that can turn an Obsidian vault into a digital garden website.</p>

<p><em>When my “Publish” subscription ends, I plan on giving Quartz a try.</em></p>

<p><em>Tags: <a href="https://journal.dinobansigan.com/tag:JournalEntry" class="hashtag"><span>#</span><span class="p-category">JournalEntry</span></a> <a href="https://journal.dinobansigan.com/tag:DigitalGarden" class="hashtag"><span>#</span><span class="p-category">DigitalGarden</span></a> <a href="https://journal.dinobansigan.com/tag:LiteratureNotes" class="hashtag"><span>#</span><span class="p-category">LiteratureNotes</span></a> <a href="https://journal.dinobansigan.com/tag:PermanentNotes" class="hashtag"><span>#</span><span class="p-category">PermanentNotes</span></a> <a href="https://journal.dinobansigan.com/tag:Zettelkasten" class="hashtag"><span>#</span><span class="p-category">Zettelkasten</span></a></em></p>



<div id="post-signature" id="post-signature">
<div class="alert-info">
<b><a href="https://remark.as/p/journal.dinobansigan.com/journal-entry-003">Discuss...</a></b> or leave me a comment below.
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
      <guid>https://journal.dinobansigan.com/journal-entry-003</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 18 Sep 2022 17:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>